The point of having a corporate mobility policy is that it protects the interests of the company; and promotes the safety and productivity of individual employees.
Furthermore without one, a Company could be failing in its legal responsibility to apply due diligence to workplace practice.
It could also be argued that the Company is implicit in allowing employees to use their mobile phones inappropriately if common practice is not challenged by the Company.
The Company itself is also at risk of losing commercially sensitive information or intellectual property and is vulnerable to exploitative and costly behavior by employees.
Top four risks of not having a mobile phone policy
The risks of not having a mobile phone policy revolve around four key areas
RISK #1 Employee Behaviour
A Company that does not formally disavow risky employee behavior around mobile device use opens itself up to accusations from employees that they “thought the behavior was acceptable.”
Some of the more common risky behaviours include:
Employees have been known to be remarkablely creative about justifying unreasonable behavior with their corporate devices.
A Techradar.pro survey found that 53% of us use our work devices for personal activity, from shopping to social networking, gaming and pornography. 5% will watch or listen to pirated material, 3% will 'sext', have compromising photographs or install a pornography app on their device; and 2% will have Tinder installed.
Even though it is against the law in Australia to handle a mobile device while driving, surveys consistently show that 32 per cent of drivers will read a text message and 18 per cent of drivers will send a text message while driving.
Risky employee mobile device use can have disasterous consequences for individuals and a Company including:
Having an open unprotected mobile device is like inviting a stranger to come into your office and do what they like.
A corporate mobile phone policy would address risky practices like:
RISK #3 Trending Cost Escalation
In Australia most companies who provide their workers with a mobile device will do so with an associated telco service plan with built-in allowances for voice and data activity.
The excess charges for exceeding the allowance or for use which is not included in the allowance can be exhorbitant.
The most common types of non-compliant use include:
RISK #4 Loss of Employee Productivity
Twenty-four percent of workers admit they spend at least an hour a day on personal email, texts and personal calls.
Australians have become so addicted to their smartphones that they can not imagine not checking them during business hours.
In fact the addiction to being always connected has even been given the (non)working title – nomophobia – by health professionals in the United States.
Australian schools know first hand the power of the mobile phone distraction. Most have already instituted a “not seen, not heard” mobile phone policy, and some schools have even taken to collecting phones at the start of class and returning them at the end of class.
Australian companies, however, have not really caught onto the massive impact on productivity that technology distraction has. Companies have not spelt out their expectations around personal mobile phone use and have not put management processes or consequences for non-compliance in place.
A mobile phone policy will address all four of these risks and give employees clear guidance about acceptable and appropriate behaviour in their mobile device use.
How to build a Corporate Mobile Phone Policy (that protects your business and your employees), is an ebook for any person or team responsible for employee behavior and/or mobility costs.
It explains:
Related Blogs